"History shows that the United States has moved forward in astonishing ways thanks to national investment in basic research and advanced technology. However, we should not be in the business of steering investment toward particular politically favored approaches. That is a recipe for both time and money wasted on projects that do not bring us dividends."So he doesn't want to play favorites. There are plenty of economists who share this basic philosophy: let the market determine the winners. (In general I agree with this philosophy, but only if the market prices externalities appropriately.)
His site also says:
Wait! I thought he just said no special treatment. I don't see anything on his site trying to streamline the process for offshore wind farms.
- Expand NRC capabilities for approval of additional nuclear reactor designs
- Streamline NRC processes to ensure that licensing decisions for reactors on or adjacent to approved sites, using approved designs, are complete within two years
"The United States is blessed with a cornucopia of carbon-based energy resources. Developing them has been a pathway to prosperity for the nation in the past and offers similar promise for the future.Isn't the US also blessed with a cornucopia of non-carbon-based energy resources, too? What happened to the "no playing favorites" line? Why single out shale gas development and extraction. What about over-regulation of offshore wind?
- Conduct comprehensive survey of America’s energy reserves
- Open America’s energy reserves for development
- Expand opportunities for U.S. resource developers to forge partnerships with neighboring countries
- Support construction of pipelines to bring Canadian oil to the United States
- Prevent overregulation of shale gas development and extraction"
Well, it's what we should expect I suppose. But he sure doesn't do much of a job trying to hide the blatant hypocrisy.