Showing posts with label washington dc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label washington dc. Show all posts

WaPo letter writer is all wrong

On November 14, the Washington Post published this letter to the editor from Hays Browning of Washington, DC
With more bicyclists on the District’s streets, the D.C. Council should review the rules governing their behavior. The prohibition of bicycles on sidewalks should be extended from the downtown core to busy areas such as Georgetown, Dupont Circle, Cleveland Park and Glover Park. Sidewalks are supposed to be safe for pedestrians, but bicyclists are acting as if they have the right of way.
The Metropolitan Police Department should enforce the law against bikes running red lights and stop signs. If bicyclists obeyed basic rules, they might find less aggressive driving by motorists. Bicyclists also should not ride in the wrong direction on one-way streets unless there is a designated bike lane. Bicyclists should make sure drivers can see them, especially after dark. In any collision with a motor vehicle, right or wrong, the bicyclist is most likely to come out second-best.
Maybe Capital Bikeshare could remind its customers of proper bicycle behavior and courtesy. If that behavior doesn’t improve, perhaps we will head in the direction of countries where bicyclists are required to be licensed.
Hays Browning, Washington
It's disappointing that the Post would publish this.  Although it is the opinion of a letter writer, it perpetuates misconceptions and does little if anything to advance the needs of anyone: driver, cyclist or pedestrian.

First, why are cyclists on the sidewalk in the first place?  Because they like scaring little old ladies walking there?  No.  They ride on the sidewalk, because they do not feel safe and comfortable riding in the street.  If Mr. Browning would like the cyclists to get off the sidewalk, he should advocate for better bicycle facilities.  Cyclists rarely if ever bike on the sidewalk along 15th St. NW, because they have a safe, comfortable place to ride designed for them - the 15th St. cycletrack.

Likewise, cyclists will not ride on the sidewalks in these other locations either, if provided with safe and comfortable options.

If bicyclists obeyed basic rules, they might find less aggressive driving by motorists.

Who is Mr. Browning referring to?  Does he have insight into anyone else's driving behavior besides his own?  How can he make this assertion?  I might ask him if he would somehow alter his driving habits if he perceived all the cyclists behaving the way he would like.  Does he currently drive aggressively around cyclists on purpose?  If not, then who does he claim does, and how does he know they will change their behavior?  Or is he just making this up?

If that behavior doesn’t improve, perhaps we will head in the direction of countries where bicyclists are required to be licensed. 

Like where?  I just spent 10 minutes on Google and could not find a single example.  If Mr. Browning knows of a place that has bicycle licensing that results in greater safety for all road users, I'd love to hear about it.

Arlington County's new "wayfinding" signs going up.

Within the last two weeks or so, Arlington County has restarted its placement of signs along the multi-use trails.  I am very pleased to see that, for the most part, they meet the first and most important criterion of a sign--to tell you where you are.  My previous post on this issue criticizes "wayfinding" signs for not adhering to this extremely simple and common sense dictum.

I also blogged last year when the County piloted a few of these signs.  Based on what I am seeing, it seems some of the issues I raised are being noted.  So far, these signs are a big improvement over anything I have previously seen pretty much anywhere.

Arlington County begins posting new trail "wayfinding" signs

Arlington County has started installing the first of the 250 "wayfinding" signs it has planned for along the Rosslyn-Ballston corridor (as detailed here).  I have blogged on trail signs in the past--mostly negative, because they either tend to not exist or fail to function well.

So it's great that these are finally going up.  I'm sure I will have criticisms (see below), but signs of almost any kind are better than the absence of signs.  So all in all, this is a great step forward.

 I took pictures of them and their exact locations are shown on this map:
This one is mounted on the sound wall at the entrance of the trail  It is excellent that the signs indicate the name of the trail.  In the past, this has often been a problem.  Signs would point towards destinations but would fail to tell you where you were.  Now someone using Google Maps and given the direction "Turn Right on the Custis Trail" will have confidence they are in the right place when they reach the trail.
The East Falls Church distance indicator is swapped with the one on the sign below.  This sign is actually closer to East Falls Church than the sign below, but indicates that it is farther away.
--------------------------------------------

New member of Car2Go

I just joined Car2Go, a new car-sharing concept that has just debuted in Washington DC.  I was able to join for free during a promotional period (if you are in the area, try the promo word "capital").

I'm not sure when I'll try it out, but since it was free to join and there are no costs until I actually use a car, there's no downside.

I saw some tweets suggesting that Car2Go will supplant Zipcar.  No doubt there will be competition, but Zipcars can hold more passengers and they are available outside the city of DC, which is where I live.  So for now, I can see opportunities to use both.

And the cars are cute.

Capital Bikeshare featured on Streetfilms

The amazing success of Capital Bikeshare is being noted not just here in the DC area (such as in the Wash Post), but nationwide and around the world.  The acclaimed Streetfilms featured Capital Bikeshare last month.

How Capital Bikeshare is making D.C. a better place

5371236165_f0fb865098[1]
Photo by M. V. Jantzen
 The Washington Post ran a Local Opinions piece last Saturday (How those red public bikes are changing D.C.) by D.C.-area blogger and founder of the Greater Greater Washington blog, David Alpert.  The article laid out all the great reasons Capital Bikeshare is doing well and should be supported and expanded.
Here's an excerpt:
Building roads or trains is expensive, while growing CaBi (usually pronounced “cabbie”) is one of the cheapest ways we have to quickly improve mobility. Consider this: Simply rebuilding the Gainesville Interstate 66 interchange will cost about 18 times as much as setting up the whole CaBi system.

Green Business Roundtable now on Facebook

I chair a monthly gathering of professionals called the Green Business Roundtable.  In partnership with the Wharton Club of DC, the GBR usually meets at the National Press Club for a buffet lunch and a guest discussion leader.  Click on the Facebook link to the right for updates and notifications of upcoming meetings.

Hope to see you there!

Bicycle Facility Film Screening ar Arlington Central Library Brings Biking Community Together

More than 100 people attended the film screening held on Monday evening at the Arlington Central Library.  This film screening was hosted by the Arlington Bicycle Advisory Committee, with additional assistance (including sponsoring the food) from BikeArlington.
_MG_6950
Although many attendees were from Arlington, there were also representatives from Fairfax County, Falls Church, Alexandria, DC, Montgomery County and even one from Kentucky who was in town to attend the National Bike Summit.

Mark Blacknell, Chair of the Advisory Committee, made some remarks and introduced and thanked a number of people, including Arlington County staff who work on bicycling related matters and the staff of BikeArlington, who work to spread the word about biking throughout the community. Image001
The film, a documentation of bicycle practices compiled by James MacKay during a 2009 European tour, was relatively technical in nature. However, it catalyzed an animated discussion afterward among attendees.  As a member of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, I was excited to see so many people with ideas and opinions about how to improve bicycling in our community and the region.

Afterward, approximately 20 attendees retired to a nearby bar/restaurant to carry the discussion further.
The Arlington Bicycle Advisory Committee is open to the public, and all are invited to attend.  Meetings are held the first Monday of the month at 2100 Clarendon Boulevard in the ground-floor conference rooms.  We hope to see you there. 

If you are interested in keeping up with news about bicycling in Arlington and would like to be notified about future events, please visit the BikeArlington Forum or send an email to BikeArlington.

Tips for Getting the Most Out of Carsharing

As a long time user of ZipCar/Flexcar in the Washington DC area (I originally joined Flexcar in 2004 and was absorbed into ZipCar when they merged), I have a few tips I can share with others.  If you have some tips you've learned, please add them to the comments.

14 minutes - Sometimes you need a car for just slightly longer than an hour.  Zipcar allows you to take the car up to 14 minutes early without additional charge.  If you take it 15 minutes early, though, you'll get charged for an extra 1/2 hour.  I will often reserve a car that is unreserved for the immediately preceding time period, knowing that I can then take it for an extra 14 minutes.

I've never tested the grace period on the back end, because the fine for a late return is $50 (see next tip).  I think I've gotten away with a minute or two, but I've never tried to stretch it more than that.

Text messaging and extensions - Sometimes the problem is on the back end, you're not sure you can make it back on time.  You can always reserve for an extra 1/2 hour, but then if you return it more than 30 minutes before the end of the reservation, you feel slightly cheated.

Here's what to do.  Sign up for text alerts (under the "help" tab, select Zipcar mobile).  Your car will text you about 20-30 minutes before your reservation ends.  You can text back (not while driving, though!!) right up to the very last second.  Suppose traffic is tricky and you're not sure you are going to make it in time, but you might OR say you are picking someone up at the airport, and you don't know how long you'll have to wait for them to come out.  You can wait right up until :59 and then send the extension txt message; your reservation will be instantly extended.

Of course, this only works if the car is not reserved after you, Which brings us to. . .

Before and after strategies - If you are going to use either of the preceding tips, then you'll want to manage your reservation timing.  Perfect would be a car that had a 1/2 hour gap on both ends, because no one can reserve it in those gaps.  Then you would know it was available 14 minutes early and also available for a last-second extension if needed.  Longer gaps will work, too, since other drivers aren't likely to try to squeeze a reservation in between two other drivers--especially if there are other cars available.


In the scenario above, I can pick up the car as early as 11:16 for no additional charge.  I can then keep it until 12:30.  As late as 12:29 I can txt for an extension and keep the car until 1:00 if needed, obviously being charged for the additional 30 minutes if I request the extension.  This gives me the flexibility to use the car for up to 1:44 with an original 1-hour reservation.

Walk around the car first - Speaking from personal experience, make sure you look for damage before you get in.  I had a long, painful battle with Zipcar over pre-existing damage, because I did not report it until a few minutes into my reservation.

Drive a hybrid! - Many hybrids and some other cars are often only $7/hour.  Check the pricing when reserving and save yourself a few dollars.

92ACAD61-C990-638A-AD90DD36016599EE
Retrieving forgotten items - If you leave something in the car, you can retrieve it for up to three hours without charge.  Your ZipCard will still unlock the vehicle--unless someone else has opened the vehicle since.  If you don't drive anywhere, then there is no additional charge.  Hopefully the car is still there when you realize you left your phone in it.
====================
(cross posted on CommuterPage blog)

Bike O'Meter Gives Real-Time Snapshot of Bikesharing Worldwide

If you haven't already seen the interactive, animated map that shows station activity for Capital Bikeshare stations, be sure to check it out here.  Following on that, and using the same data, a new app created by Steven Gray, called Bike-o-Meter, is also providing useful real-time data on bikesharing systems from around the world.

Each of the dials shows the percentage of total bikes in use at that particular moment in time.  It is not able to differentiate between bikes that are actually being ridden and those that may be in transit for relocation or taken out for servicing.  However, it uses the maximum number of bikes in the system within the last 24 hours--not the advertised total number of bikes owned by the service--as the denominator in the calculation.  Here's a bigger screenshot showing 2.8% of Capital Bikeshare's bikes in use at 1:04 PM on Wednesday, October 27.

I noticed that Barcelona's usage rate at 7:00 PM was 22%.  There were about 4500 bikes in service in Barcelona at that time, so that's almost 1000 bikes in use.  Wow!  Click on either graphic for a larger view.

Capital Bikeshare launch - Some photos



Yesterday's launch of Capital Bikeshare was a great success, underscored by perfect weather: cool temperatures and blue skies.  I rode with a caravan of riders who delivered bikes to the Crystal City bikesharing stations.  Here are a few photos from the event:

Station at 15th and Crystal Drive before it is populated with bikes
The brand new bikes all lined up on Tingey Plaza
DDOT chief Gabe Klein (at mic), Arlington County Board Chair, Jay Fisette (in black shirt) and Mayor Adrian Fenty (right) at the launch event
All the riders saddling up for the inaugural ride

Riding along the Southwest waterfront in DC
Our caravan of riders turning onto the 14th Street Bridge access ramp
The Crystal City station now populated with bikes thanks to these riders

Monday What's on the Web: The Washcycle

Every Monday I highlight other bloggers or web contributors who are making important or interesting contributions to climate, sustainability, transportation or market transformation. Check back each week for another installment.
----------------------------
The WashCycle is DC's most well-known blog specifically dedicated to bicycling in the region.  It takes a very partisan view (of which I am pretty much on board with) that cyclists and cycling could benefit from much more support from all angles: funding, government, business, media, etc.

It covers the news related to cycling as well as issues.  Most posts get from a few to numerous comments--primarily from the bicycling community.  It's very worthwhile to follow if you are a resident of the DC area and cycle even just occasionally.  Also, if you are interested in transportation issues in general and how cycling fits in with them. . .and how the cycling community views these issues.

Recent posts include:

15th Street Expansion and redesign

Are shower requirements like minimum parking requirements

More on trail crossings of roads

 

 

Monday What's on the Web: Greater Greater Washington

Every Monday I highlight other bloggers or web contributors who are making important or interesting contributions to climate, sustainability, transportation or market transformation. Check back each week for another installment.
----------------------------
Greater Greater Washington is a regional blog focused on the Washington DC area. In just a couple of years it has grown to become a highly respected and widely read resource for people interested in issues that affect the current and future Washington DC metro area. Many days it garners over 20,000 page views.

Issues run the gamut, but often focus on transportation and development as drivers for the future. The blog takes a very new urbanist angle on these issues--tending to suggest ideas like complete streets, increased and improved transit, increased costs for driving and parking, better bike facilities, mixed-use and transit-oriented development, etc. It reflects the goals of this blog in that it is working towards positive transformation that will improve our environment and quality of life.

David Alpert runs the blog and has actually become a known person to some in the local media (some like him; some don't). It is clear that some staff at Metro and local jurisdictions read the blog and may actually be taking ideas from it. There are several dozen contributors, and the blog runs several posts a day--so the content is always changing as well as substantial. I am one of those contributors, and you may see my posts here.

Security Barriers: A Little More Thought

The concrete planters around the Hirshhorn Museum helped slow a wayward truck that crashed into the museum Monday night. This incident was not a deliberate attempt to attack the building; it was a totally freak incident which had never happened before. Although this will probably spur efforts to increase the security measures around the building, it really should be a catalyst for rethinking the purpose and even the need for these ugly and ineffective barriers entirely. Not just here, but in most locations in DC.

Post 9/11, jersey barriers, concrete planters, bollards and other "security" measures sprung up like weeds everywhere in Washington, DC. First they were located around places like the White House and Capitol, but before long they started surrounding virtually every building that housed a federal worker or was owned by some level of government. By now, the totality of those barriers must cover scores of acres of valuable sidewalk real estate. They create an unwelcome atmosphere to pedestrians, forcing them to weave and sometimes wait for others to make room just to walk to and from their destinations. Most of them are unsightly at best and downright ugly at worst. The open space and welcomeness of virtually every outdoor space in the core of DC has been degraded.

It's understandable that we put measures in place to protect the White House, Capitol and other key potential targets. But, HELLO!, the Hirshhorn is not a target. It is not on any terrorist's list of buildings. Shoot, most people have never even heard of it. When out-of-towners come visit, and I recommend it to them, never once has anyone heard of it before. I even know people who live here in DC who haven't heard of it. It's not on the list. Neither is the Renwick, the Phillips Collection, the Freer Gallery, etc.

The Guggenheim Museum in New York City is much more iconic than the Hirshhorn. A quick check of street view in Google shows no barriers protecting the museum entrance from the street. Pedestrians may walk easily and directly into the building without any impedance from barriers of some sort. Likewise with the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Chicago Art Institute, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, and, for that matter, the most famous art museum in the world--the Louvre in Paris. What are we afraid of that they are not?

Washington DC is the capital of the United States, supposedly the beacon of freedom in the world. Yet in our capital, the simple freedom of being able to walk on sidewalks and enter public buildings unaccosted has been taken away. Each little step in this direction chips away at the free society that supposedly reflect our nation's fundamental values (see recent post re: overhyped security on Earth Day).

Linda St. Thomas, a Smithsonian spokesperson said that the planters did what they were supposed to do. What?!? What exactly is it they are supposed to do? Were they supposed to "slow" an out-of-control truck so that it still struck the building, causing damage, but maybe not as much? Was that their intent when they put them in? That's laughable. No, they were put there to protect the building from intentional attack; it's just coincidental that they happened to slow the truck down a bit--not the intention of the barriers at all. In fact, now it's obvious that these barriers all around town are just a charade, because they wouldn't stop a determined terrorist anyway--they can just be pushed aside by a medium-sized truck. The point, though, is not that we need to bolt them down or make them heavier. It's that they don't really need to be there at all, because they are an illusion--protecting against an imaginary threat.

Here's a thought experiment. Imagine the truck had its accident a mile or two away in a commercial corridor--running into a storefront. Would the reaction be to suddenly install some sort of barriers along the street to protect against the rare wayward vehicle? Would we put up bollards or barriers along every street? No. The owner would file a claim with its insurance company, fix up the store, and life would go on as before, with the sidewalks adjoining the street as always.

The Hirshhorn is an art and sculpture museum. It celebrates the aesthetic of the visual. The building itself--love it or hate it--is a piece of visual art. It is surrounded by sculptures. If anyone should understand the negative visual impact of these ridiculous planters (even worse are the jersey barriers on the Jefferson Dr. side of the museum), it should be the curators at this museum.

Ms. St. Thomas also said (as reported in the Washington Post), "Maybe one piece of good that could come out of this is a little more funding and little more thought into where we really do need security and how we do that correctly and appropriately,"

Yes, a little more thought, thank you. And perhaps a little less funding. Like let's get rid of them entirely in about 90% of their locations around DC. They are unnecessary; evidently they don't even function to protect the buildings as intended; they rob us all of valuable space; they are ugly, visual clutter; they run counter to our nation's values; and they degrade the experience of citizens of and visitors to our nation's capital.


(Louvre photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/juanillooo/ / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Garnering Support for Traffic Enforcement Cameras

Last year, the Washington Post published an article about speeding and red-light cameras (Shudder speed, Nov. 5). The article cited many cases of citizens hating the cameras, voting against them, vandalizing them and otherwise being significantly opposed. Personally, I'm fine with the cameras, since I do not speed or run red lights, which is, of course, the ultimate weapon to use against them.

However, I do find myself in partial agreement with those who argue that the cameras are used to raise government revenues. At the end of the day, if everyone obeyed the rules, the cameras would collect no revenue, which is good and a laudable goal. However, until that day, the cameras are collecting fines. I believe that money could be strategically used to garner support for the use of the cameras themselves.

The article stated that DC collected about $36 million in revenue for fiscal year '08 from camera fines. If half of that is actually needed to operate the cameras and administer the fines, etc., that leaves $18 million in other revenues. I actually have no idea of these numbers: I am making them up. I would think that once the system is established, that the administrative costs would be much lower than this, but I don't know.

I suggest we take a lesson from the state of Alaska. Citizens receive a payment from the Alaska permanent fund, which is funded from minerals royalties. DC could do likewise, refunding each citizen their share of the camera excess revenues fund. Using my example above, each citizen would get a check for about $30. That's not an enormous amount, but it helps resolve two issues:
- Arguments about the cameras being primarily as revenue generators would become moot, since the city would not keep any revenues beyond the costs of administering the program.
- Support, particularly among law abiders and non-car owners would strengthen. I know that if my household was going to get a check every year from fining criminal drivers, I would be very supportive.

(cross-posted on Greater Greater Washington)

Pedestrian Improvements in Greater Washington

Route 50 ped bridge from northwest It's almost done; ribbon cutting is scheduled for May 20. Even before I moved to a part of Arlington that is not far from Seven Corners, I was aware of the significant number of pedestrian deaths that were occurring along the stretch of Route 50 (Arlington Boulevard) near Patrick Henry Drive and Seven Corners (right by the Home Depot to point out a familiar landmark). Ped Bridge MapIt is the deadliest intersection in all of Fairfax County, accounting for approximately 25% of all pedestrian fatalities in the county: on average 2-4 per year. The county has known this is a problem area since at least 1987. I don't have the statistics, but extrapolating from known numbers, more than 50 pedestrians may have been killed here in the last 20 years. Here's a map of the area (one detail: the actual location of the bridge is somewhat west of what is shown. This is taken from the official VDOT site).

Creating separate pedestrian facilities is often not the best solution. What I, and many progressive urban planners believe is better, is to make our streets and roads more accessible, safer and more usable for all users: pedestrians, cyclists, Segway riders, and cars. Sometimes planners will create a poorly designed or planned pedestrian facility that will then "relieve" them of their responsibility to think more holistically about the interactions of road users. I agree with this viewpoint, but in this case, the pedestrian bridge at Seven Corners is a big, big improvement, and probably is the only reasonably safe enhancement that can be implemented in the short term. It also is located where pedestrians have generally wanted to cross and where many have been injured or killed.

Prior to the construction of this bridge, the only possible crossing points were at Patrick Henry Drive (not all that safe either: pedestrians have been killed in the crosswalk; the county has improved this crossing in the last couple years, but it's still a 6-lane highway) and Cherry Street, a distance of 1.3 miles from each other. Although one could cross at the Seven Corners overpasses, it requires a brave and fleet person to do so. There are no actual pedestrian facilities like sidewalks or lights there. So crossing at either Patrick Henry or Cherry St. requires a very long schlep, thus many people choose to make the mad dash across Route 50. For years the county tried to force pedestrians to the crossing at Patrick Henry rather than find a safe solution to their need to cross closer to their destinations.

There are homes, apartments and significant commerce on both sides of the highway, so there are lots of reasons for people to cross. One would think that the businesses would have an interest in making it easier for people to reach their establishments, too. I do not know if they were engaged in the project, though. On more than one occasion I have been in the Sunflower Restaurant looking out at the Guitar Center, seemingly close enough to touch--or at least hit with a golf ball. I measured with Google, and it's about 200 yards, so a golfer could conceivably hit one onto the Guitar Center roof from the restaurant. However, if I wanted to walk there, I could not do it. Impossible. Perhaps one could walk down Route 7 to Patrick Henry, cross there and go back up, a distance of 1.2 miles. I'm not sure there are sidewalks along this entire route, though.

By the new bridge, this distance is now still about 1/2 mile, but considerably more direct, doable and obvious to potential pedestrians.

So all in all, I believe this is a significant improvement. However, the county needs to continue to improve this area as well as the entire length of Route 50 inside the Beltway, where usable pedestrian crossings are few and far between. Here are my thoughts about this project:

- Way, way overdue, as mentioned above.
- It took a long time. This project was started in the fall of 2007. Originally it was supposed to be complete last November. Unfortunately, the original truss that was delivered was cracked, which caused a several-months delay.
- Why does the north side empty out inside the frontage road, so people still have to cross another lane of traffic to get to the sidewalk (see photos)? If the frontage road had been shifted a little southward, the bridge would need to be somewhat longer, but not much. They completely rebuilt this entire area, so it could have been designed that way. I often wonder why--when we're building a piece of infrastructure that will be there for 40 years or more--that more thought isn't put into these details.
- Pedestrian access on both sides needs to be addressed now that the bridge is complete. Completing well designed sidewalks and creating pedestrian access to cross the parking lots will make the bridge much more usable.
- There are still way too few ways to cross in this 1.3 mile stretch. Seven Corners itself needs to be rethought and redesigned to accommodate other road users besides cars (and it doesn't even do a very good job with those!) [Update: I learned at the ribbon cutting that this will happen in a couple of years.]
- It probably cost too much (I've read $2.6 million) [Update: I learned at the ribbon cutting that total costs were more like $8 million!]. Although it appears to be an excellent facility, Fairfax County is not known for its willingness to invest in bike/ped facilities. I suspect that the next time someone suggests an improvement, the county will say, "But that one at Seven Corners cost so much; we can't afford to spend that kind of money willy nilly on pedestrians."

I've also included a number of photos below, which you can expand by clicking. There's also a great article in the Falls Church News Press by Penny Gross describing the placement of the main bridge section a couple of weeks ago.

7 corners overpass 2 Taken in February from the Barnes & Noble parking lot prior to installation of the bridge (click to enlarge)


Route 50 ped bridge looking east from 7 corners 2 Looking east from Seven Corners. Home Depot is behind the bridge to the right (click to enlarge).

Route 50 overpass showing frontage road 2Looking West along Route 50. You can see the ramp pedestrians will come down and then have to cross the frontage road on the right to get to the sidewalk. Dumb. (Click to enlarge)

Route 50 overpass inside look

At the top of the ramp looking south across the bridge. Still a little work being finished up.

==========

(Cross posted with lots of comments on GreaterGreaterWashington)

We're #2. Do we do it to ourselves?

TrafficToday's Washington Post reported on the annual congestion rankings put out by the Texas Transportation Institute, and the DC area tied for 2nd with an average of 60 hours of congestion for peak period commuters.

What caught my eye, though was this tidbit:

"You feel helpless," an Arlington resident was quoted, who drives between Rosslyn and his job in downtown Washington.

Huh? Helpless?!? He DRIVES from Rosslyn to his office on 15th St. NW! I guess that's his prerogative (maybe), but then he has no right to whine about the traffic and claim that he's "helpless." He could freaking WALK to his office in 45 minutes or less. It's at most a 15-minute bike ride--maybe less. He could squeeze on a metro train for 6-7 minutes from Rosslyn to McPherson Square. He could also get a Metrobus to Farragut Square and walk a couple of blocks.

He complains, but he is also actually part of the problem. Remember, when you are sitting in traffic,Boy_confused_2 you ARE the traffic, too. He's doing both himself and everyone else a disservice by not figuring out all his choices, which are many.

What more can we do? Here's a guy with half a dozen options who still chooses to sit in traffic for a 3-mile commute. No one's going to build a new bridge between Rosslyn and DC, nor add any more roads between the river and his office. Widening I-66 won't make any difference to him. The only thing that would improve his drive is if fewer people were driving. But if he's unwilling to get out of his own car, how can he expect everyone else to stop driving, too? He's his own enemy.